Isn’t it a little bit surprising there aren’t two states with capital cities the same name? Like, why couldn’t Kentucky have put its capitol in Jackson? Doesn’t “Jackson, Kentucky” make at least as much sense as “Frankfort, Kentucky”? And wouldn’t it just be great if the capital of Washington were Lincoln? Why not “Dover, Oregon”? “Albany, Montana” is no more absurd than Billings. I think some of these states could make do to share capital city names. If we picked some state — let’s say Colorado — and declared that its capital was named Providence, and we called it that long enough and consistently enough, eventually we’d be right. Especially if we edited Wikipedia. City names aren’t carved in stone, except for in concrete highway overpasses. We have the power to make them anything we want. We need to use this power for good, is what I mean, and I propose that making some states tied in this ordering is a good.
- New York
- Maryland
- Georgia
- Maine
- Texas
- Louisiana
- North Dakota
- Idaho
- Massachusetts
- Nevada
- West Virginia
- Wyoming
- South Carolina
- Ohio
- New Hampshire
- Colorado
- Iowa
- Delaware
- Kentucky
- Pennsylvania
- Connecticut
- Montana
- Hawaii
- Indiana
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Alaska
- Michigan
- Nebraska
- Arkansas
- Wisconsin
- Alabama
- Vermont
- Tennessee
- Oklahoma
- Washington
- Arizona
- South Dakota
- Rhode Island
- North Carolina
- Virginia
- California
- Minnesota
- Oregon
- Utah
- New Mexico
- Illinois
- Florida
- Kansas
- New Jersey
I see India didn’t make this list.
LikeLike
Oh, you’re right! How could I forget?
If I have it right India should fit in between Tennessee and Oklahoma. If it did that certainly would spruce up the Mississippi Valley.
LikeLiked by 1 person