- 1. 1
- 1. (tie) 6
- 1. (tie) 10
- 1. (tie) 2
- 5. 5
- 5. (tie) 4
- 5. (tie) 9
- 5. (tie) 0
- 9. 8
- 9. (tie) 7
- 9. (tie) 3
- 12. 11
- 12. (tie) 30
- 12. (tie) 12
- 12. (tie) 20
- 16. 15
- 16. (tie) 16
- 18. 18
- 18. (tie) 14
- 18. (tie) 19
- 18. (tie) 13
- 22. 17
- 23. 21
- 23. (tie) 26
- 23. (tie) 22
- 26. 25
- 26. (tie) 24
- 26. (tie) 29
- 29. 28
- 29. (tie) 27
- 29. (tie) 23
Tag: arithmetic
How the Problem of Identity is Solved in the Early 21st Century
I imagine that, like most people, I find Twitter mostly recommends I follow the feeds of actors from sitcoms I don’t watch and of fictional squirrels. But now and then it turns up someone I do want to follow and sometimes that’s an organization. I saw one that sounded interesting and I checked their profile and recent tweets to make sure they were for real and not just somebody tweeting about how I should buy something I don’t want.
Since they seemed pretty soundly to exist I clicked to start following them. But then a couple hours later I got an e-mail saying they were thinking of following me back, but they wanted some proof that I was an actual person and not just tweeting about how they should buy something they don’t want. Never mind wondering who are they to ask if I’m someone when I already figured out if they’re someone: they wanted me to prove I was for real by clicking a link to a Captcha thingy.
So how do I know their link was to a legitimate Captcha service and not someone out to subvert the whole notion of identity with fake reports? So that’s why I checked their service’s contact information and sent them a simple arithmetic problem to determine whether they’re for real, and I went on with the satisfied air of a person who’s found more reasons not to answer his e-mail.
I was less satisfied when they sent someone over to whap me with a stick. This would seem to prove they really exist, though, except the guy they sent went to the wrong house, and I bet they were wondering why I was pointing at them and snickering.
